« Is it just me...Asymmetric state of the race: Listening to the debate from the Angel game »

Asymmetric opinion on first presidential debate- Obama, McCain 2008

09/27/08

1. I listened to the debate from the Angel game last night. Like the Texas Rangers, McCain won handily. However, it may not have changed the standings, so to speak.

2. When did it get to the point that a win for Obama means not embarrassing himself? Wasn't he supposed to be the articulate one and McCain the tottering old fool?

3. McCain won throughout and decisively.

4. Obama struck first, trying to tie McCain to Bush policies. Obama is counting on people being dumb. To people with a certain minimum level of political sophistication, the McCain-Bush references were clumsy and obvious. I should think that most people are tired of that line, Obama's only real strategy throughout the campaign, but maybe not.

5. McCain successfully countered those attacks with examples of his disagreements with Bush and Republicans in general.

6. McCain attacked Obama's spending without seeming mean.

7. On economics, McCain's Ireland example was very effective. Obama was very weak on the economy. Here's what people should (will?) take away: Obama wants to spend a lot of money and raise taxes. McCain wants to spend a lot less and reduce taxes so that the economy can grow.

8. Obama brought up "childhood education." McCain was right to ignore it. Refuting it sounds mean and there's no need anyways. Even in super-liberal California, a pre-school initiative lost in the last election (It's weird that only people without children voted for it.).

9. On foreign policy, McCain pounded Obama like a drum. In fact, people may have felt sorry for Obama on some level.

10. Obama didn't "umm" and 'ahhh" quite so much.

11. Obama's Kenya story was out of place and sappy.

12. People have already commented on the bracelet thing. Obama's an insincere huckster.

13. McCain took Obama's hanging curveball on veteran issues and hit it out of the park. I liked when McCain said that he "loved" the veterans. We don't hear enough about "love."

14. If McCain can articulate a free-market, supply side argument for lowering taxes, he may score some points. It's been so long that somebody has argued such a point of view that it doesn't sound "tired" at all, but kind of fresh. The recent goings-on in Washington may give people more confidence in "Main street" than Washington D.C. and that's good for Republicans.

15. McCain missed some opportunities and didn't start new lines of attack although the Ireland thing was good. If he can do it in an artful way, many people would be surprised to learn that the financial crisis is mostly Democrats' fault.

16. If McCain doesn't gain from this debate, and nothing else happens, he's finished.

Tags: , ,
By nguirado ( Email ), 09:28:47 am, 431 words
PermalinkCategories: Campaign 2008 :: 1 comment »

1 comment

Comment from: cruz [Visitor]
People who argue on the resulting winner of the debate "match" are mostly following their own preferential predispositions. Being an outsider myself and maybe relatively more of an objective observer, I would say that the political debate was poor. This is simply because of a lack of substance and too high a theoretical and abstract stance shared by both sides. Let's be clear, politics are highly complex and none of the candidates have proved to have a concrete understanding of every piece of issue they were debating on. McCain did try however to make us think that he had more concrete experience and basis for analysis. "I went to Irak... I went to Afghanistan..." :-) I have to say myself, with the historical and economical knowledge that I have gained from !various sources of information!, that both candidates lack the honesty to admit that they do not know in much depth most of what they are talking about. Again, politics are highly complex especially when one has to debate on every piece of issue relating to a nation. It would have been more honest, and right for candidates to argue on the processes they are to follow in order to find solutions when a president, rather than pretending they already know the answers.
09/28/08 @ 02:53

Leave a comment


Your email address will not be revealed on this site.

Your URL will be displayed.
(Line breaks become <br />)
(Name, email & website)
(Allow users to contact you through a message form (your email will not be revealed.)
1+1=
antispam test