| « Obama gambles on American stupidity | Is it just me... » |
Preparing for an Obama presidency- Best case scenario for conservatives
09/29/08
I've offered my sword and pen (tablet) to McCain and will do what I can to elect him, but if Friday's debate helped Obama, it looks very very bad for McCain-Palin.
However, Obama to become our commander in chief, we should not despair, fall into lefty style hatred and nit-picking, or otherwise lose our heads. Specifically, we shouldn't go nuts with the Jeremiah Wright ads and predict economic disaster. The non-economic disaster of the Clinton administration lost conservatives a lot of credibility like liberals lost credibility on...well, everything else (crime, taxes, welfare, school, etc.). In fact, it's the distant memory of a disastrous Democratic administration that will allow Obama to win.
Before I begin my best-case scenario, I'd like to state that this isn't the most important election of my lifetime. Of those, I consider the 68, 76, 80, and 2004 elections more important. Why?
The war in Iraq is won. Kerry would have lost the war in Iraq just to spite Bush and other hegemonists. Although Obama can't claim credit for winning the war, he will rightly be blamed for losing it and will thus not leave just to please Code Pink loonies.
Furthermore, Obama will keep the United States safe because he doesn't want another attack any more than Bush or McCain does and increasing security also increases government (win-win for Democrats). Liberals don't really care about securing their library records from the Patriot Act gestapo. They'd let a liberal intrude on any part of their life just like they let Clinton start any war he wished.
So, barring a road-to-Damascus-like conversion, a best case Obama scenario would be Clinton II or: an uneventful presidency with no major foreign policy or housing-like economic challenges and a vigorous Republican opposition:
1. Obama will raise taxes until people begin to notice and then he'll either stop, saving the economy and his re-election, or defiantly continue and insure a Republican takeover of congress. I don't anticipate another new industry (Save me the "green jobs" idiocy.), like the nineties' PC-internet revolution, to allow economic growth in a high-tax environment (Also, most people don't remember the investment and other taxes lowered by the Republican congress and that the economy was already recovering when Clinton came into office.).
Taxes don't permanently damage the economy- they can be lowered- and even in California, people reject huge tax increases.
3. Health care will remain private. Have you noticed how little Obama is talking about health care? His whole strategy is "McBush" nonsense. Why? Because people don't want DMV health care. Obama will increase SCHIP or some other program and leave everything else as it is. Chances are Obama won't have huge tax revenues to play with and saying that more government will reduce health care costs is like saying that all Brittney Spears needs is more cowbell.
A more credible Republican party will better counter the Democratic strategy of artificially raising health costs until people cry for the government to save them. Either way, it's just too huge a sector of the economy to change within the two-year window Obama will have.
4. Obama's Supreme Court justices won't be outright Communists. Abortion will still be legal and some minor rulings will weaken business and reduce the effectiveness of public safety officials, but nothing major.
5. Obama will waste money on preschool education and other programs. He may require that those preschool teachers be union members (because we know it takes a college degree to teach finger painting). Obama'll pass rules to enable union intimidation and help downtrodden trial lawyers, but, again, nothing permanent. Obama will pour our money down the UN sink, but it's just money, si?
6. Obama will realize that solar powered Mustangs don't go very fast and let oil companies drill, maybe raising their taxes or guarantee that new drilling require union labor or something. He'll also allow nuclear plants. The congress already gave up on the ban and don't want to go down for something as indefensible as not creating jobs and lowering gas prices for what is, essentially, a personal piety.
7. Limitations on economic freedom will stop at federal workplace rules outlawing perfume and employers having some kind of trans-vestite quota.
8. The transfer of wealth to already rich colleges in order to achieve Obama's dream of a sociologist on every block will allow for better campus gym equipment.
9. Europe will welcome not being made to feel wussies for being the only group of people on Earth willing to do everything possible to hasten its own destruction. Consequently, err...I don't know, but some people care about this stuff. Oh, I remember. So that we can count on France and Germany's support every time we decide to do nothing.
10. Iran and Russia will decide that eliminating corruption at home is a pre-requisite to regional conquest. Their clean up efforts will take five years.
Tags: consequences of an obama presidency, what if obama wins?4 comments
Nelson I respect your opinion but you're totally trying to convince yourself here. First of all to say "The non-economic disaster of the Clinton administration lost conservatives a lot of credibility" is unbelievable considering that this mortgage mess is Clintonian policy coming home to roost. I'm not a fan of McCain as you know because he's not really a conservative, but he had this Fannie/Freddie issue pegged a few years ago. A president's economic policies take many years to come to fruition. Reagan's best years economically were his last and into the Bush and Clinton administrations. An Obama presidency could be disastrous economically. This is what we get for nominating a guy who has no core ideology. He's not going to defend conservative economic principles because he doesn't believe in them.
Our only hope is a repudiation in the mid term elections of 2010. Jebus.
I have not yet given up hope for Mr. McCain to win. If he loses, however, I have a similar opinion to yours. It will not be as dramatic as we now think (I hope). If we judge Mr. Obama by his past actions, we can see that he plays it safe at every turn. Like Clinton before him, he has a strong need to be popular, loved. I worry about the people he will choose to surround him but I think he will take the safe path in most cases. His number one goal once he gets in office will be to get two terms. If there are to be any fireworks, he now thinks he will hold off for a second term if he can get one. If that does happen, he will not do anything unsafe then either because that would jeopardize his legacy and his chances to become a Supreme Court Justice or U.N. Secretary General.
Henry, the perception is that the Clinton years were good economically.
Certainly that's the perception Nelson but the only way to change it is to combat it with a little something called truth. You just posted an article from 1999 about Fannie/Freddie. The American people aren't dumb. Create one of those commercials with the newspaper headline and the announcer reading a quote or two from Barney Frank and Chris Dodd and juxtapose it with McCain taking on Freddie/Fannie.The big criticism of Fred Thompson was that his heart wasn't in it. I don't know how people came away with impression but McCain was CORRECT on this issue and it blew up now on the eve of an election. He SHOULD HAVE OWNED THIS ISSUE on Friday night. WTF is up with John McCain's heart?






