| « Battlestar Galactica Crossroads part one | Quality free-PC driven, Oscar predictions » |
Movie Review 300 (Three Hundred)
03/11/07
Every so often a movie comes along and provides the public with a new way to visualize physical violence. Recent examples include Saving Private Ryan, Hidden Dragon, Matrix, and Lord of the Rings. Such is the case with 300. Along with massive formations of combatants crashing into each other followed by cleaving and slashing sword play introduced by LOTR and imitated by Troy, Narnia, Eragon, and others, 300 often slows down the action to highlight the ballet-like skill of the Spartan warrior.
In addition to the battle scenes, 300 is riddled with other small but powerful visual details like beads of sweat dripping down a body, seagulls hovering in the distance, and a pre-combat gathering of soldiers in what looked to be Rotoscope. Admirers of the male form will find even more compelling things at which to look, I imagine.
One intriguing aspect of 300 is the film-makers’ imagining of men and creatures. Perhaps the film makers wanted to create a world of fantastic beasts as in LOTR or Star Wars, but felt constrained by the fact that they were, after all, recounting a historical event. Instead of creating creatures, therefore, they merely exaggerated the features of real animals and people. The beginning of the movie, for example, features an unnaturally large wolf with glowing eyes. The Persian king, Xerxes, is ludicrously large, yet his size has no point other than to highlight his power relative to the Spartans or, perhaps, to represent his own self-perception. Other examples include a grotesquely misshapen and discarded Spartan traitor, disgustingly diseased priests, and various Persian warriors of strange appearance or unrealistic size.
Like the efficient combat moves of the Spartan soldier, 300 moves briskly and with a purpose. After the Sparta for Dummies introduction to ancient Spartan society by the narrator (really, one of the best uses of voice narration in film- I enjoyed every time he spoke especially the amazing scene where, after a moment of suspense and confusion, he provides the real reason the King removes his helmet and discards his shield), the film quickly establishes why the King must defend a strategic pass from the Persians with only 300 soldiers. The rest of the movie mostly describes how the Spartans fare in the several battles leading up to the excellent conclusion. The dialogue consists almost entirely of manly boasts which bothered me a little until I read later that the screenwriters took many of those boasts strait from historical accounts. Amongst the other historical facts to which I admit having been ignorant are that unlike modern day Greeks, ancient Spartans were completely hairless from the neck down and had, apparently, perfected the Ab Lounge.
The political-intrigue subplot seems to be unhistorical, however, and it’s largely superfluous. Undoubtedly, it was inserted to provide contrast to the frantic, all-male battle-scenes; the Queen’s speech in front of the Spartan council is good if unspectacular.
All of the performances are fine although since 300 only leaves room for one tone per character, actors aren't exactly required to express a broad range of emotions. The tones are defiant shouting, deep-voiced intimidation, and suave deception. I think I heard a joke in 300 and ladies are treated to noble, pensive husbandry and Spartan sex (3 minutes to each). Gerard Butler as King Leonidas is cast perfectly, as his rough looks keeps with the manliness theme. Other movies set in ancient times, Troy and Alexander, feature metrosexuals Brad Pitt and Colin Farrell.
Message/Politics
300 is one of the few modern movies that not only glorifies soldiers and their bravery, but war itself. The film-makers suggest that war is useful as a character-building tool, that dying in battle is the most fitting end for true men, and that people unwilling to fight are cowards. While some noise is made about fighting for freedom, one gets the sense that Spartan Mens' main motivation is simply to not get beat or, at least, to not lose honor (a nearly forgotten concept in the Western world and, therefore a shocking idea to many moderns). Not once does the king consider peaceful alternatives or regret steering events towards war. When a father loses his son in battle, the incident steels his resolve instead of forcing him to question the whether such a sacrifice was justified. Essentially, 300 thinks of war the same way Spike TV thinks of Ultimate Fighting Championships.
Another theme is an odd one and of special interest to soldiers. The movie contrasts the skill of the professional soldier to the citizen-soldier. For years, the battle of Thermopylae has been used by the military scientist to demonstrate the superiority of training and terrain over sheer numbers and the movie makes the same case.
Other non-PC moments include calling Athenians “boy-lovers” like there’s something wrong with it; differentiating between “real men” and "non-real" men (politicians); and, unlike movies like King Arthur, admitting that pagans did some bad things like abandon unfit babies.
All in all, a great movie.
Direcor Zack Snyder
Writing credits
(WGA)
Zack Snyder (screenplay) &
Kurt Johnstad (screenplay) and
Michael Gordon (screenplay) (as Michael B. Gordon)
Frank Miller (graphic novel) and
Lynn Varley (graphic novel)
Cast (in credits order)
Gerard Butler ... King Leonidas
Lena Headey ... Queen Gorgo
Dominic West ... Theron
David Wenham ... Dilios
Vincent Regan ... Captain
PermalinkCategories: Now playing at a theater near you :: 14 comments »
14 comments
I was reading this horrible review of the 300 and had to respond.
First of all I would have to ask the author of this review if he has ever kissed a woman?
Tired of all the violence in America? How about you go and play house with the other girls?
300 is for men, AND for women who appreciate the masculinity still clinging to a very few men
in America today. Guess what? You are so far from the pulse of America, I cannot believe anyone actually
reads your reviews. You should get into politics, your levels of consciousness are very similar (altered)
The 300 movie keeps you glued to your seat, excellent special effects, and a deferent feel altogether was
placed on this unique money making masterpiece.
I only have a second to write this review, but REAL MEN go see it, you will not be disappointed.
As far as the critic of this film, I bet you sat up on the hill and watched the Spartans fight in a past life.
If it wasn't for real men dying historically in battle, you wouldn't be able to write this article.
Check the grammar on this page for me geek, when your done ..stick it up your ass.
What a pussy!
See it! You will love it!
American Warrior
From a man's point of view
I actually agree with you. Nazis loved Sparta and the movie is pro-war. As for Arabs (Persians, actually): Well, that's who they fought. What do you want them to do?
The "Exagerated" forms of human and animals as you called them
were meant to emulate what Frank Miller had drawn in the most realistic way possible without becoming comical. Also the whole visual tone of the movie is simple from the spartans shield to the persian arrows. It is meant to look graphicaly engaging.
As far as all the non-Pc moments like the "Boy Lovers" comment, the Athenians and the Spartans had a very real rivalry that would have accounted for that. Also he was refering not to homosexuality but pediphelia anyway(and that is wrong).
In refference to soldiers being true men and politicians being non-men. The whole movie is about ideals and standing up for what you believe in. Believe it or not back then people would kill you for what you thought(as seen in this day and age also) if you did not have the strength to stand on your own and defend yourself you were screwed and your society was screwed. They werent trying to say that your station was what detemined masculinity it was your actions and how you treated people, "give respect and honor and it will be returned". You stated that Leonidas never ounce looked for a peaceful resolution. That was not an option Xerxes was coming no matter what there was no other way than to fight him.
Do more research before you write a review this information can be found everywhere including the 300 movie site.When you write a review leave your personal feelings out. Its great if you don't like certain aspects of the film list why in an intelligable manner not by making infantile jokes.
P.s. This movie could not be further from the Nazi mentality. The Nazis may have idealized the spartans but there is no way the actual spartans would have ever agreed with anything that the Nazi's did. You are all missing the best messages of the movie. Family, love strength and courage. Stop interpreting things through your own hangups.
Did king leonidas mean to miss at the end of the movie with the spear throw? Did he just want to injure the god king to show him he is human? or was he trying to kill him and missed?
i think that this movie is the best of your category.the scenario is so originall and the history very intristing...i don't have words to express my satisfaction in the quality this movie.
it's very good movie. i can't watch it only once.I hope i can be like Leonidas. not only discipline but also he is strong and wise
((Saman Moghadam to protest plans to theft Script "hundred years to these years))http://www.cinscreen.com/?id=326
شاکي فيلم سامان مقدم دست بردار نيست
سخنان مرتضي شايسته پاسخ گرفت
http://www.pernews.com/news_item.asp?content_ID=106587
نامه ي سرگشاده به "سامان مقدم" و "مرتضي شايسته" در ارتباط با سرقت هنري فيلم "صد سال به اين سالها"
ماجراي اعتراض به فيلم "صد سال به اين سالها" منتفي نشده است
http://ilna.ir/newstext.aspx?ID=109109
thank for you very mach 





