| « Cooliris-annoyance, cool, or cool annoyance? | Computer review- Dell Inspiron e1505/6400 - the best compromise. » |
Tech Review Plantronics 590 590E
12/31/06
Since nobody in my household shares my taste in music, it was unsubtly suggested to me that I needed to invest in some headphones. "Fine," I said, but before I granted them peace, the headphones had to meet two criteria: they had to be wireless and they had to work with my primary music-maker, the Dell E1505 in front of me at this moment. With wireless, I could leave my computer in one room and walk around the house listening to music or talk radio. After searching a while I discovered that some wireless headphones could also be used portably; "Finally," I thought, I can run without the wires getting in the way.
One can choose between two wireless technologies. The first is RF, or radio frequency, which is probably what you're using with your mouse or keyboard right now. You don't want to use Radio Frequency, however, as RF has a short range and you have to carry the receiver (usually called a USB dongle) with you for whichever device you use. It's also rare to find a receiver with an internal battery which means forget about using it with your iPod. Bluetooth, on the other hand, can work with the built-in Bluetooth in your computer or, if you don't have it built in, you can still use a USB receiver dongle. Bluetooth wireless headphones can do a few things RF cannot as well. First, you can use the headphones with your Bluetooth telephone. Let's say you're dancing to a song from Cubanocast in the living room and your phone rings in the kitchen. With Bluetooth headphones, you can answer the call and, when you're finished, get back to dancing. Things look to get even more convenient as Bluetooth becomes available on mp3 players and stereo receivers.
Having settled on Bluetooth, I looked at three Bluetooth headphones, the Logitech Mp3, the IOGear Wireless Bluetooth Stereo Headphone Kit, and the Plantronics Pulsar 590. All go for about $100.00 and all work with computers or portable devices. They each come with a Bluetooth emitter that plugs into a standard 3.5mm mini plug, the small plug to your headphones found on almost all computers and music devices. There's also an adapter for the bigger 1/4 inch adapter on your receiver. The emitter sends any audio signal to your headphones via Bluetooth, allowing you to make any device, even those without Bluetooth, wireless. And since the emitter can be charged, you can use it with iPods, portable DVD players, or the Creative Vison, my preference.
The Logitech has two drawbacks that earned it a trip back to the Fry's Electronics. First, you can't use it with your phone which wasn't a big deal for me, and second, the behind the back design makes it impossible to listen to it while lying in bed. I've also heard the quality of the Logitech neckband questioned.
The IOGear works with phones, but is a behind the back style like the Logitech and that broke the deal. It's also more uncomfortable.
The Plantronics 590 uses the standard headphone configuration so I can lie down with them. They also sound great, have a full 30 foot range, and last for hours without having to plug it into the handy charging station. I plug the emitter into my mp3 player and take my three-mile jog around the block. It also works with my Motorola Razr cell phone which I'm sure about 60% of you have.
However, as much as I like it, I can't give it five stars because the Plantronics cramps my style. It has a strongly pulsating blue glow which makes me look like a geek-and I'm not a geek, honest. OK, maybe a little, but do I have to advertise my geekiness everywhere I go? And does the whole plane have to know I the status of my Bluetooth connection? This geekastrophic embarrassment prevents me from taking it to the gym, for example (that and the blue light also clashes with my orange bike shorts). So, a good product made a little worse than necessary.
PermalinkCategories: Computers, Digital Music/ Mp3 :: 3 comments »
3 comments
Excellent review, well done.I picked one of these up the other day so I thought I'd share my take on the pros and cons:
PROS...
1. Amazing sound - audiophile's will love them
2. They grip your head really well, great for when walking/jogging etc.
3. Works with my HP Vista (home premium) laptop as well as my Sony Ericsson (v630i) mobile phone.
4. Works with Skype
CONS...
1. I'm with the author, that "strongly pulsating blue glow" is a real bummer. I would be very reluctant to wear these in public.
2. The grip. This is a pro and a con. They grip your head so well I need to adjust them every 20 mins or so to 'relieve the pressure' :)
3. Too uncomfortable to lie on my side while wearing them.
4. My bluetooth mouse interferes with transmission of sound. I've had to revert back to my RF mouse.
Nelson, as long as I know using Bluetooth in the air it is geeky as well as suicidal. Bluetooth is radio and worse than a cell phone. Better not use it while travelling on board (in your interest and in the interest of safety of other passangers). So as long as one is using the blue flasing BT headset, he/she is practically telling everybody he/she is a geek. Keep this in mind.Polocanada
Bluetooth or the standard cellphone signal (850/900/1800/1900) are ALL in the EM spectrum, and Bluetooth radiates only approx 1% of what many cellphones do (FYI for the tinfoil hat wearing Canadian who thought BT was "worse" than cellphones ;-) ). This means 100 people could be using Bluetooth (BT) on your plane and that's likely to radiate LESS into your noggin (per minute) compared to your single phone if you hold it to your head for a conversation (since their 100 BT phones are much further away than 2" from your head).Even the radiation that 'bleeds' from a cellphone's antenna up the wire, to a WIRED headset, was measured to put approx twice the radiation into your brain than a wireless BT headset does.
And in the average school building tested, FM radio, WiFi, and television stations (all in the electro-magnetic spectrum) radiated several times more than a class-2 (30' range) BT phone that's worn on your person...oh horrors, we've been subjecting children to EM radiation for DECADES in the case of TV and radio!! No wonder brain cancer rates shot up in the 20th century!!
Oh wait...they didn't. Because although EM radiation is likely to kill if you're surrounded by hundreds of times the intensity than average people encounter (e.g. people who live near or work on cellphone towers are not "average," and even their likelihood to have higher cancer rates is so small that even that data has been mixed.), the threat of cancer from BT --or even from the more powerful WiFi, FM radio, or television sources of EM radiation-- is so weak as to be unmeasureable.










